The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacGill, T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kozel, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MacGill, T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kozel, T. R.
The Journal of Immunology, 2000, 164: 4835-4842.
Copyright © 2000 by The American Association of Immunologists

Biological Correlates of Capsular (Quellung) Reactions of Cryptococcus neoformans1

Tracy C. MacGill*,{dagger}, Randall S. MacGill*, Arturo Casadevall§ and Thomas R. Kozel2,*,{dagger}

* Department of Microbiology and {dagger} Cell and Molecular Biology Program, School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557; and {ddagger} Division of Infectious Diseases, § Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461

The capsular swelling or quellung reaction was reported almost 100 years ago and described the effect of Abs on the appearance of microbial capsules. Despite widespread use to assess Ab binding to capsules, relatively little is known as to the mechanism of this effect or its biological consequences. The fungus Cryptococcus neoformans is an attractive system to study capsule reactions because it has a large polysaccharide capsule that is readily visible by light microscopy. When viewed by differential interference contrast microscopy, binding of mAb to C. neoformans cells produced two distinct capsular reactions that depended on the Ab epitope specificity and the yeast serotype. In the first pattern, termed "rim," the capsule appears transparent with a highly refractive outer edge. In the second pattern, termed "puffy," the capsule appears opaque and lacks a highly refractive outer rim. mAbs that bind with a rim pattern suppress the overall rate of C3 deposition on the yeast via the classical and alternative complement pathways. In contrast, mAbs that bind with a puffy pattern do not affect C3 deposition. Protective and nonprotective IgM mAbs produce rim and puffy patterns, respectively. These results indicate that: 1) capsule reactions are a consequence of Ab-induced changes in capsular refractive index; 2) the type of capsule reaction depends on the Ab specificity; and 3) Ab-induced changes in refractive index correlate with biological activities important for host defense against C. neoformans. Our results provide the first evidence associating distinct capsule reaction patterns with Ab biological activity.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 2000 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 2000 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.