HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kesmir, C. Articles by De Boer, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kesmir, C. Articles by De Boer, R. J.

A Mathematical Model on Germinal Center Kinetics and Termination¹

Can Kemir^2,* and Rob J. De Boer

^* Center for Biological Sequence Analysis, Department of Biotechnology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark; and Theoretical Biology Group, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

We devise a mathematical model to study germinal center (GC) kinetics. Earlier models for GC kinetics are extended by explicitly modeling 1) the cell division history of centroblasts, 2) the Ag uptake by centrocytes, and 3) T cell dynamics. Allowing for T cell kinetics and T-B cell interactions, we study the role of GC T cells in GC kinetics, GC termination, and B cell selection. We find that GC T cells play a major role in GC formation, but that the maintenance of established GC reactions requires very few T cells only. The results therefore suggest that the termination of a GC reaction is largely caused by lack of Ag on the follicular dendritic cells and is hardly influenced by Th cells. Ag consumption by centrocytes is the major factor determining the decay rate of the antigenic stimulus during a GC reaction. Investigating the effect of the Ag dose on GC kinetics, we find that both the total size of the GC and its duration are hardly influenced by the initial amount of Ag. In the model this is due to a buffering effect by competition for limited T cell help and/or competition between proliferating centroblasts.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. S. Moreira and J. Faro Modelling Two Possible Mechanisms for the Regulation of the Germinal Center Dynamics J. Immunol., September 15, 2006; 177(6): 3705 - 3710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Meyer-Hermann and P. K. Maini Cutting Edge: Back to "One-Way" Germinal Centers J. Immunol., March 1, 2005; 174(5): 2489 - 2493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Mehr, H. Edelman, D. Sehgal, and R. Mage Analysis of Mutational Lineage Trees from Sites of Primary and Secondary Ig Gene Diversification in Rabbits and Chickens J. Immunol., April 15, 2004; 172(8): 4790 - 4796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Beyer, M. Meyer-Hermann, and G. Soff A possible role of chemotaxis in germinal center formation Int. Immunol., December 1, 2002; 14(12): 1369 - 1381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. R. Levin and R. Antia Why We Don't Get Sick: The Within-Host Population Dynamics of Bacterial Infections Science, May 11, 2001; 292(5519): 1112 - 1115. [Abstract] [Full Text]