|
|
||||||||
Protein Engineering Group (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique-URA 1129), Unité de Biochimie Cellulaire, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
The impact of somatic hypermutation on the affinity of Abs directed
against protein Ags remains poorly understood. We chose as a model the
secondary response Ab D1.3 directed against hen egg lysozyme. During
the maturation process leading to this Ab, five replacement somatic
mutations occurred. After reconstituting the germline Ab from which
D1.3 originated, we assessed the energetic and kinetic importance of
each of the somatic mutations, individually or combined, using the
BIAcore apparatus. We found that the mutations induced an overall
60-fold improvement of affinity, principally due to a decrease in the
kinetic rate of dissociation. We showed that their effects were
additive and context independent; therefore, in the case of D1.3, the
order in which somatic mutations were introduced and selected is
unimportant. Interestingly, most of the affinity improvement was due to
a single somatic mutation (Asn50
Tyr in
VL), involving a residue that belongs to the
functional interface between Ab D1.3 and lysozyme. This replacement
could either establish new Van der Waals contacts between the Ab and
the Ag or help stabilize the conformation of a closely situated crucial
residue of the Ab paratope. The four other mutations played only a
marginal part in affinity maturation; potential reasons for which these
mutations were nevertheless selected are
discussed.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. L. Kallewaard, B. A. McKinney, Y. Gu, A. Chen, B. V. V. Prasad, and J. E. Crowe Jr. Functional Maturation of the Human Antibody Response to Rotavirus J. Immunol., March 15, 2008; 180(6): 3980 - 3989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Clark, S. Ganesan, S. Papp, and H. W. T. van Vlijmen Trends in Antibody Sequence Changes during the Somatic Hypermutation Process J. Immunol., July 1, 2006; 177(1): 333 - 340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Monsellier and H. Bedouelle Quantitative measurement of protein stability from unfolding equilibria monitored with the fluorescence maximum wavelength Protein Eng. Des. Sel., September 1, 2005; 18(9): 445 - 456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Cauerhff, F. A. Goldbaum, and B. C. Braden Structural mechanism for affinity maturation of an anti-lysozyme antibody PNAS, March 9, 2004; 101(10): 3539 - 3544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Beyer, M. Meyer-Hermann, and G. Soff A possible role of chemotaxis in germinal center formation Int. Immunol., December 1, 2002; 14(12): 1369 - 1381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Brown, M. A. Schumacher, G. D. Wiens, R. G. Brennan, and M. B. Rittenberg The Structural Basis of Repertoire Shift in an Immune Response to Phosphocholine J. Exp. Med., June 19, 2000; 191(12): 2101 - 2112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Thomas, S. I. Patenaude, C. R. MacKenzie, R. To, T. Hirama, N. M. Young, and S. V. Evans Structure of an Anti-blood Group A Fv and Improvement of Its Binding Affinity without Loss of Specificity J. Biol. Chem., January 11, 2002; 277(3): 2059 - 2064. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |