HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Yelon, D. Articles by Berg, L. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Yelon, D. Articles by Berg, L. J.

Alterations in CD4-Binding Regions of the MHC Class II Molecule I-E^k Do Not Impede CD4⁺ T Cell Development¹

Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138

The T cell coreceptors CD4 and CD8 enhance T cell responses to TCR signals by participating in complexes containing TCR, coreceptor, and MHC molecules. These ternary complexes are also hypothesized to play a seminal role during T cell development, although the precise timing, frequency, and consequences of TCR-coreceptor-MHC interactions during positive selection and lineage commitment remain unclear. To address these issues, we designed transgenic mice expressing mutant I-E^k molecules with reduced CD4-binding capability. These transgenic lines were crossed to three different lines of I-E^k-specific TCR transgenic mice, and the efficiency of production of CD4⁺ lineage cells in the doubly transgenic progeny was assessed. Surprisingly, replacing wild-type I-E^k molecules with these mutant molecules did not affect the production of CD4⁺CD8^- thymocytes or CD4⁺ peripheral T cells expressing any of the three TCRs examined. These data, when considered together with other experiments addressing the role of coreceptor during development, suggest that not all MHC class II-specific thymocytes require optimal and simultaneous TCR-CD4-MHC interactions to mature. Alternatively, it is possible that these particular alterations of I-E^k do not disrupt the CD4-MHC interaction adequately, potentially indicating functional differences between I-A and I-E MHC class II molecules.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. R. Menges, S. A. Jenks, E. K. Bikoff, D. R. Friedmann, Z. A. G. Knowlden, and A. J. Sant An MHC Class II Restriction Bias in CD4 T Cell Responses toward I-A Is Altered to I-E in DM-Deficient Mice J. Immunol., February 1, 2008; 180(3): 1619 - 1633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Tatari-Calderone, J. L. Brogdon, K. W. Tinsley, A. Ramezani, and D. Leitenberg CD4-Dependent Signaling Is Required for a Late Checkpoint during Th2 Development Associated with Resistance to Activation-Induced Cell Death J. Immunol., November 1, 2005; 175(9): 5629 - 5636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.-J. Kim, D. Guo, and D. B. Sant'Angelo Coevolution of TCR-MHC interactions: Conserved MHC tertiary structure is not sufficient for interactions with the TCR PNAS, May 17, 2005; 102(20): 7263 - 7267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Kao and P. M. Allen An antagonist peptide mediates positive selection and CD4 lineage commitment of MHC class II-restricted T cells in the absence of CD4 J. Exp. Med., January 3, 2005; 201(1): 149 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]