|
|
||||||||



*
Department of Biological Science and Structural Biology Program, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 30306;
Institute of Biology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; and
National Institute of Public Health and Institute of Pharmacy, Oslo, Norway
Various native and hinge-modified forms of Ig with identical Ids were reacted with an anti-Id mAb, and the resultant immune complexes were analyzed by negative stain immunoelectron microscopy. Complexes were scored for their geometry (linear versus ring complexes) and size (dimer, trimer, etc.). Ring dimers are the thermodynamically most favorable configuration, unless inhibited by steric and/or flexibility constraints. We found ring dimerization to correlate with the length of the upper, but not middle or lower, hinge. In contrast, the geometry and size of complexes of those molecules lacking formal hinges were unpredictable. A hingeless IgG mutant and native IgE readily formed ring dimers. Remarkably, monomeric IgM formed more ring dimers than any of the other Igs tested, including IgG3. We also tagged the Fab arms and measured the mean Fab-Fab angles and the degree of angular variation for each type of Ig. Surprisingly, IgM proved the most flexible by this assay. In hinged Igs, there was a correlation between length of the upper hinge and Fab-Fab flexibility. In contrast, we found no correlation between the mean Fab-Fab angle in uncomplexed Igs and their ability to dimerize with anti-Id mAb. These data suggest that the physicochemical methods typically used to evaluate molecular flexibility are often of low predictive value when tested in a functional assay.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Bonner, A. Almogren, P. B. Furtado, M. A. Kerr, and S. J. Perkins The Nonplanar Secretory IgA2 and Near Planar Secretory IgA1 Solution Structures Rationalize Their Different Mucosal Immune Responses J. Biol. Chem., February 20, 2009; 284(8): 5077 - 5087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. R. Miranda, M. Duval, H. Doherty, M. S. Seaman, M. R. Posner, and L. A. Cavacini The Neutralization Properties of a HIV-Specific Antibody Are Markedly Altered by Glycosylation Events Outside the Antigen-Binding Domain J. Immunol., June 1, 2007; 178(11): 7132 - 7138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Glaser, I. E. Hughes, J. R. Hopp, K. Hathaway, D. Perret, and M. E. Reff Novel Antibody Hinge Regions for Efficient Production of CH2 Domain-deleted Antibodies J. Biol. Chem., December 16, 2005; 280(50): 41494 - 41503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Paul, S. Karle, S. Planque, H. Taguchi, M. Salas, Y. Nishiyama, B. Handy, R. Hunter, A. Edmundson, and C. Hanson Naturally Occurring Proteolytic Antibodies: SELECTIVE IMMUNOGLOBULIN M-CATALYZED HYDROLYSIS OF HIV gp120 J. Biol. Chem., September 17, 2004; 279(38): 39611 - 39619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Cortez-Retamozo, N. Backmann, P. D. Senter, U. Wernery, P. De Baetselier, S. Muyldermans, and H. Revets Efficient Cancer Therapy with a Nanobody-Based Conjugate Cancer Res., April 15, 2004; 64(8): 2853 - 2857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Planque, Y. Bangale, X.-T. Song, S. Karle, H. Taguchi, B. Poindexter, R. Bick, A. Edmundson, Y. Nishiyama, and S. Paul Ontogeny of Proteolytic Immunity: IgM SERINE PROTEASES J. Biol. Chem., April 2, 2004; 279(14): 14024 - 14032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Loset, K. H. Roux, P. Zhu, T. E. Michaelsen, and I. Sandlie Differential Segmental Flexibility and Reach Dictate the Antigen Binding Mode of Chimeric IgD and IgM: Implications for the Function of the B Cell Receptor J. Immunol., March 1, 2004; 172(5): 2925 - 2934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. R. McLean, M. Torres, N. Elguezabal, A. Nakouzi, and A. Casadevall Isotype Can Affect the Fine Specificity of an Antibody for a Polysaccharide Antigen J. Immunol., August 1, 2002; 169(3): 1379 - 1386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Els Conrath, M. Lauwereys, L. Wyns, and S. Muyldermans Camel Single-domain Antibodies as Modular Building Units in Bispecific and Bivalent Antibody Constructs J. Biol. Chem., March 2, 2001; 276(10): 7346 - 7350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |