The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lo-Man, R.
Right arrow Articles by Leclerc, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lo-Man, R.
Right arrow Articles by Leclerc, C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
The Journal of Immunology, 1998, 160: 1759-1766.
Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists

Immunodominance Does Not Result from Peptide Competition for MHC Class II Presentation1

Richard Lo-Man2,*, Jan P. M. Langeveld{ddagger}, Pierre Martineau{dagger}, Maurice Hofnung{dagger}, Robert H. Meloen{ddagger} and Claude Leclerc*

* Unité de Biologie des Régulations Immunitaires, et {dagger} Unité de Programmation Moléculaire et Toxicologie Génétique (CNRS-URA1444), Institut Pasteur, Paris, France; and {ddagger} Institute for Animal Science and Health (ID-DLO), Lelystad, The Netherlands

Competition for binding to MHC class II molecules between processed peptides derived from a single protein Ag is considered an important parameter leading to the presentation of a limited set of peptides by APCs. We tested the relevance of this competition process in a model Ag, the MalE protein, by deleting T cell epitopes or by introducing a competitor T cell peptide. We identified in DBA/1 (I-Aq) mice six immunodominant T cell determinants in the MalE sequence, 89–95, 116–123, 198–205, 211–219, 274–281, and 335–341. Synthetic peptides carrying these determinants were classified in three groups as weak, intermediate, or strong I-Aq binders in competition experiments with the PreS:T peptide of hepatitis B surface Ag. In vivo, synthetic MalE peptides with weak and intermediate MHC binding capacity were inhibited in their capacity to stimulate proliferative response in the presence of the PreS:T competitor peptide, whereas the strongest MHC binder was not. Strikingly, the insertion of the potent competitor PreS:T peptide into the MalE sequence, as a single copy or as four copies, did not inhibit the proliferative response to the six immunodominant peptides of the recipient protein. Moreover, deletion in the protein sequence disrupting either the weak (198–205) or strong (335–341) MHC binding determinant of MalE did not modify the proliferative response to the remaining T cell determinants as compared with wild-type MalE protein. Altogether, these results show that peptide competition for MHC binding may not represent the most important event in processes leading to immunodominance.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
K. A. Richards, F. A. Chaves, and A. J. Sant
Infection of HLA-DR1 Transgenic Mice with a Human Isolate of Influenza A Virus (H1N1) Primes a Diverse CD4 T-Cell Repertoire That Includes CD4 T Cells with Heterosubtypic Cross-Reactivity to Avian (H5N1) Influenza Virus
J. Virol., July 1, 2009; 83(13): 6566 - 6577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
P. R. Menges, S. A. Jenks, E. K. Bikoff, D. R. Friedmann, Z. A. G. Knowlden, and A. J. Sant
An MHC Class II Restriction Bias in CD4 T Cell Responses toward I-A Is Altered to I-E in DM-Deficient Mice
J. Immunol., February 1, 2008; 180(3): 1619 - 1633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
V. P. Yeung, J. Chang, J. Miller, C. Barnett, M. Stickler, and F. A. Harding
Elimination of an Immunodominant CD4+ T Cell Epitope in Human IFN-{beta} Does Not Result in an In Vivo Response Directed at the Subdominant Epitope
J. Immunol., June 1, 2004; 172(11): 6658 - 6665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. Lopez, Y. Samino, U. H. Koszinowski, and M. Del Val
HIV Envelope Protein Inhibits MHC Class I Presentation of a Cytomegalovirus Protective Epitope
J. Immunol., October 15, 2001; 167(8): 4238 - 4244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CROBMHome page
M. Podmore, J.L. Ebersole, and D.F. Kinane
Immunodominant Antigens in Periodontal Disease: a Real or Illusive Concept?
Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, January 1, 2001; 12(2): 179 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. Gugasyan, C. Velazquez, I. Vidavsky, B. M. Deck, K. van der Drift, M. L. Gross, and E. R. Unanue
Independent Selection by I-Ak Molecules of Two Epitopes Found in Tandem in an Extended Polypeptide Antigen
J. Immunol., September 15, 2000; 165(6): 3206 - 3213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.