The JI PBL Intereron Source
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Rich, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Rich, R. R.

The Journal of Immunology, Vol 157, Issue 11 4970-4978, Copyright © 1996 by American Association of Immunologists


ARTICLES

Altered orientation of streptococcal superantigen (SSA) on HLA-DR1 allows unconventional regions to contribute to SSA Vbeta specificity

KR Stevens, M Van, JG Lamphear and RR Rich
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

Crystallographic studies reveal even distantly related bacterial superantigens (SAg) to adopt a common structural topology. Mutational analyses confirm that this shared folding pattern often confers a conserved function to analogous residues in different SAg, albeit with specificities for particular TCR or MHC class II molecules. It was thus surprising that the streptococcal SAg SSA differed from related SAg in the location of its Vbeta-determining residues. Because it seemed unlikely that SSA would deviate significantly from an SAg-like topology, we hypothesized that variations in SSA Vbeta-determining regions might result from differences in SSA-MHC class II interactions relative to other SAg during SSA presentation to the TCR. Comparison of the DR1-binding properties of SSA with its closest homologue SEB found different amino acid positions within SAg primary sequences to contribute to SSA-DR1 and SEB-DR1 interactions, and suggested that SSA bound DR1 with an altered orientation relative to SEB. The common involvement of DR1 alpha39K, however, predicted that the two SAg bound overlapping sites on DR1. Nevertheless, SSA and SEB did not effectively cross-compete for DR1 binding and had opposite patterns of DR1-binding affinity in the presence of distinct DR1-expressing cell lines. The data thus suggest that SSA and SEB bind not only with different orientations on DR1, but may bind preferentially to distinct DR1 subsets delineated by cell-specific factors. Differences in orientation of SSA on DR1 and/or interaction of SSA with particular DR1 subsets may explain why unconventional regions influence SSA TCR Vbeta specificity.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1996 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1996 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.