The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, D. R.

The Journal of Immunology, Vol 156, Issue 11 4266-4273, Copyright © 1996 by American Association of Immunologists


ARTICLES

Studies of tum- peptide analogs define an alternative anchor that can be utilized by Ld ligands lacking the consensus P2 anchor

RA Robinson and DR Lee
Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65212, USA.

To determine how peptides that lack a consensus binding motif interact with class I molecules, we have studied the binding of the tumor- associated tum- P91A 14-22 (tum-) peptide to Ld. Previously, a proline at position 2 (P2) and a hydrophobic residue at P9 had been defined as anchors for Ld ligands. However, the tum- peptide lacks the P2 proline anchor. To compare how peptides with and without the P2 proline anchor bind to Ld, we analyzed the binding of monosubstituted analogues of the murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV) pp89 168-176 and the tum- peptides to Ld. As expected, the binding of both peptides was inhibited by substitutions at P9, the carboxyl-terminal anchor. As also predicted, the MCMV peptide was found to be dependent upon its P2 proline for binding to Ld. By contrast, the binding of the tum- peptide to Ld is dependent primarily on a P8 aspartate residue. Interestingly, the p2Ca peptide that is immunodominant in allorecognition of Ld also lacks the P2 proline anchor and has been shown to depend on residues near the carboxyl terminus for binding to Ld. Furthermore, both the p2Ca and the tum- peptides can bind to Ld as octamers. These combined studies suggest that there are at least two alternative manners by which peptides can bind to Ld. Although most Ld ligands bind using a P2 proline anchor, the tum- and p2Ca peptides bind using alternative anchors in the carboxyl-terminal region.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Mareeva, T. Lebedeva, N. Anikeeva, T. Manser, and Y. Sykulev
Antibody Specific for the Peptide{middle dot}Major Histocompatibility Complex: IS IT T CELL RECEPTOR-LIKE?
J. Biol. Chem., October 22, 2004; 279(43): 44243 - 44249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H. R. Turnquist, J. L. Petersen, S. E. Vargas, M. M. McIlhaney, E. Bedows, W. E. Mayer, A. G. Grandea III, L. Van Kaer, and J. C. Solheim
The Ig-Like Domain of Tapasin Influences Intermolecular Interactions
J. Immunol., March 1, 2004; 172(5): 2976 - 2984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. A. Smith, N. B. Myers, M. Robinson, T. H. Hansen, and D. R. Lee
Polymorphism at Position 97 in MHC Class I Molecules Affects Peptide Specificity, Cell Surface Stability, and Affinity for {beta}2-Microglobulin
J. Immunol., September 15, 2002; 169(6): 3105 - 3111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. M. C. Hornell, S. M. Martin, N. B. Myers, and J. M. Connolly
Peptide Length Variants p2Ca and QL9 Present Distinct Conformations to Ld-Specific T Cells
J. Immunol., October 15, 2001; 167(8): 4207 - 4214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
F. Rodriguez, M. K. Slifka, S. Harkins, and J. L. Whitton
Two Overlapping Subdominant Epitopes Identified by DNA Immunization Induce Protective CD8+ T-Cell Populations with Differing Cytolytic Activities
J. Virol., August 15, 2001; 75(16): 7399 - 7409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Kageyama, T. J. Tsomides, N. Fukusen, I. A. Papayannopoulos, H. N. Eisen, and Y. Sykulev
Potent Cytolytic Response by a CD8+ CTL Clone to Multiple Peptides from the Same Protein in Association with an Allogeneic Class I MHC Molecule
J. Immunol., March 1, 2001; 166(5): 3028 - 3034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. L. Zarling, J. G. Johnson, R. W. Hoffman, and D. R. Lee
Induction of Primary Human CD8+ T Lymphocyte Responses In Vitro Using Dendritic Cells
J. Immunol., May 1, 1999; 162(9): 5197 - 5204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Ulbrecht, S. Modrow, R. Srivastava, P. A. Peterson, and E. H. Weiss
Interaction of HLA-E with Peptides and the Peptide Transporter In Vitro: Implications for its Function in Antigen Presentation
J. Immunol., May 1, 1998; 160(9): 4375 - 4385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. K. Balendiran, J. C. Solheim, A. C. M. Young, T. H. Hansen, S. G. Nathenson, and J. C. Sacchettini
The three-dimensional structure of an H-2Ld-peptide complex explains the unique interaction of Ld with beta-2 microglobulin and peptide
PNAS, June 24, 1997; 94(13): 6880 - 6885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1996 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1996 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.