The JI PBL Intereron Source
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lin, T.
Right arrow Articles by Nomoto, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lin, T.
Right arrow Articles by Nomoto, K.

The Journal of Immunology, Vol 155, Issue 9 4224-4230, Copyright © 1995 by American Association of Immunologists


ARTICLES

Development of TCR-gamma delta CD4-CD8+ alpha alpha but not TCR-alpha beta CD4-CD8+ alpha alpha i-IEL is resistant to cyclosporin A

T Lin, G Matsuzaki, M Umesue, K Omoto, H Yoshida, M Harada, C Singaram, K Hiromatsu and K Nomoto
Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Hospitals, Madison, USA.

Present evidence suggests that cyclosporin A (CSA) inhibits the development of both alpha beta and gamma delta T cells in the thymus. However, whether CSA can inhibit the development of murine intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes (i-IEL) is unknown as most i-IEL are clearly derived from a different lineage than the conventional thymus- derived T cells found in the periphery. Using the adult thymectomized, lethally irradiated bone-marrow reconstituted chimera (ATXBM mice) as a model for the development of extrathymically derived i-IEL and the fetal thymus-grafted (FTG) nude mice as a model for the development of thymically derived i-IEL, we demonstrate that CSA nearly completely inhibited the development of extrathymically, and possibly thymically, derived TCR-alpha beta i-IEL. Most of the TCR-alpha beta i-IEL whose development was inhibited by CSA belonged to the CD4-CD8+ alpha alpha subset. In contrast, the development of extrathymically and thymically derived TCR-gamma delta i-IEL was completely resistant to CSA. The phenotype of CSA-resistant TCR-gamma delta i-IEL in these models was not different from those in control mice, and the TCR-gamma delta i-IEL in CSA-treated mice appear to be mature and activated as most were large, granular, and CD69+. Lastly, we demonstrate that CSA does not affect the extrathymic positive selection of V delta 4 i-IEL in C3H hosts. These results suggest that despite their similarity, the intracellular activation cascade involved after TCR stimulation between TCR-alpha beta CD4-CD8+ alpha alpha and TCR-gamma delta CD4-CD8+ alpha alpha i-IEL are markedly different.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Med.Home page
M. E. Garcia-Ojeda, S. Dejbakhsh-Jones, I. L. Weissman, and S. Strober
An Alternate Pathway for T Cell Development Supported by the Bone Marrow Microenvironment: Recapitulation of Thymic Maturation
J. Exp. Med., June 1, 1998; 187(11): 1813 - 1823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1995 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1995 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.