The Journal of Immunology, Vol 155, Issue 4 1951-1963, Copyright © 1995 by American Association of Immunologists

ARTICLES

Structural requirements of peptide and MHC for DR(alpha, beta 1*0401)- restricted T cell antigen recognition

JM McNicholl, WC Whitworth, F Oftung, X Fu, T Shinnick, PE Jensen, M Simon, RM Wohlhueter and RW Karr
Immunology Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.

We identified functionally important regions of the DR(alpha, beta 1*0401) peptide binding site and present a model of bound peptide. DR(alpha, beta 1*0401)-restricted T cell recognition and peptide binding of Mycobacterium leprae (ML) peptide 38-50 and overlapping peptides from the 18-kDa heat-shock protein were analyzed. ML38-50 is unusual in its restricted binding pattern, binding to only one of five DR4 subtypes and no other DR molecules tested. Amino acid substitutions were introduced into ML38-50 and the DR(alpha, beta 1*0401) peptide binding site at positions likely to influence peptide-MHC or peptide- or MHC-TCR interactions. Peptide binding, T cell proliferation, and computer modeling studies suggest that residues 39F, 42E, and 44D of ML38-50 interact with pockets 1, 4, and 6, respectively, of the peptide binding site. Only DR(alpha, beta 1*0401) substitutions at residues in pockets 4 or 7 prevented binding of ML38-50, while multiple substitutions at other positions negatively affected its T cell recognition. In contrast, T cell recognition of some high affinity ML peptides that overlapped ML38-50, and contained N-terminal extensions, was only abolished with pocket 4 substitutions. An inverse correlation of peptide affinity for DR(alpha, beta 1*0401) with negative effects of MHC substitutions on T cell recognition of the overlapping ML peptides was observed. Thus, some regions, such as pocket 4, dominantly influence T cell recognition of multiple DR(alpha, beta 1*0401)-binding peptides. However, each DR(alpha, beta 1*0401)-binding peptide appears to have unique properties that determine the outcome of its MHC-peptide interactions and the relative importance of other polymorphic pockets.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Matsuo, L. Corlett, S. Hawke, M. Nicolle, P. Driscoll, S. Deshpande, E. Spack, and N. Willcox Distant interactions between dimorphisms in HLA-DR4 radically affect recognition of defined peptides by a specific T cell clone Int. Immunol., May 1, 1999; 11(5): 835 - 843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. G. Doherty, J. E. Penzotti, D. M. Koelle, W. W. Kwok, T. P. Lybrand, S. Masewicz, and G. T. Nepom Structural Basis of Specificity and Degeneracy of T Cell Recognition: Pluriallelic Restriction of T Cell Responses to a Peptide Antigen Involves Both Specific and Promiscuous Interactions Between the T Cell Receptor, Peptide, and HLA-DR J. Immunol., October 1, 1998; 161(7): 3527 - 3535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]