The JI Acurri Cytometers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Enk, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Katz, S. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Enk, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Katz, S. I.

The Journal of Immunology, Vol 151, Issue 5 2390-2398, Copyright © 1993 by American Association of Immunologists

ARTICLES

Inhibition of Langerhans cell antigen-presenting function by IL-10. A role for IL-10 in induction of tolerance

AH Enk, VL Angeloni, MC Udey and SI Katz
Dermatology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.

IL-10 is a product of activated keratinocytes and is released during the induction phase of contact sensitivity. As IL-10 effects have been described as being mediated by APC, we investigated effects of IL-10 on epidermal Langerhans cells (LC), the resident APC in the epidermis. Initial studies failed to demonstrate effects of IL-10 on MHC class II Ag expression by LC or anti-CD3 mAb- or alloantigen-induced LC- dependent T cell proliferation. However, production of IFN-gamma and IL- 2, (but not IL-6) was markedly reduced in these assays. When the soluble-protein Ag specific T cell clones AE7 (Th1) and D10.G4 (Th2) were substituted for unprimed T cells, differential effects of IL-10 on T-cell proliferation were observed. Whereas IL-10-pretreated and untreated LC supported Th2 cell proliferation equally well, IL-10- pretreated LC were essentially unable to induce Th1 cell proliferation in response to native protein or peptide Ag. The inhibitory influence of IL-10 on Th1 cells was observed when fresh or 1 day cultured LC were used; 2- or 3-day cultured LC were affected to a much lesser extent by IL-10 pretreatment. Further, coculture experiments using IL-10- pretreated or untreated LC of a different haplotype suggest that IL-10 negatively regulates a costimulatory signal required for induction of Th1 cell proliferation. To assess whether T cells incubated with Ag and IL-10-pretreated LC were responsive to further stimulation, T cells were rescued after 1 day of coculture with IL-10-pretreated LC and restimulated, either immediately or after 1 to 5 days of rest, with untreated LC in the presence of Ag. T cells incubated with IL-10- pretreated LC were found to be anergic, whereas T cells incubated with untreated LC proliferated normally after further stimulation. However, anergic T cells responded vigorously to IL-2. These data indicate that although IL-10-pretreated LC are effective APC for Th2 cells, they fail to induce Th1 cell proliferation and rather induce clonal anergy in these cells.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1993 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1993 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.