The Journal of Immunology, Vol 151, Issue 4 1998-2013, Copyright © 1993 by American Association of Immunologists

ARTICLES

Molecular and kinetic analysis of an epitope-specific shift in the B cell memory response to a multideterminant antigen

JL Press and CA Giorgetti
Rosenstiel Research Center, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02254-9910.

Our previous studies showed that the primary and memory B cell responses to the multideterminant antigen poly-(L-Tyr, L-Glu)-poly-D,L- Ala-poly-L-Lys ((T,G)-A-L), differ. The primary response is dominated by antibodies binding side-chain epitopes; there is little antibody response to epitopes on the poly-D,L-Ala-poly-L-Lys backbone of (T,G)-A- L. In contrast, B cells producing A-L+ antibodies constitute approximately a third of the memory response to (T,G)-A-L. To determine the basis of this epitope-specific repertoire shift, we have examined the kinetics of expression of A-L+ B cells and antibodies after in vivo antigen priming and identified VH and V kappa genes used by A-L+ hybridoma antibodies derived from primary vs memory B cells. Kinetic studies, using the splenic focus assay, showed that the clonal frequency of A-L+ B cells remains low (<3% of (T,G)-A-L-specific B cells) 1 wk after Ag priming, increases (9%) by 2 wk, but does not reach the memory frequency (30%) until at least 3 wk after immunization. Molecular analyses showed that both the primary and memory A-L+ antibody responses are heterogeneous, using different VH and V kappa gene families as well as different germ-line genes within a VH gene family. Both H and L chain gene sequences showed somatic mutations in primary as well as memory antibodies. Analysis of antibody binding patterns and somatic mutations in a set of clonally related B cells that use a new germ-line VH gene in the VGAM3.8 family (VGK7, described here), showed a direct correlation between somatic mutation and change in antibody binding specificity. Our results demonstrate how somatic mutation and Ag selection play a role in the development of the memory response to a multideterminant Ag. The data are discussed in the context of the single vs dual lineage models for memory B cell generation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Aviszus, X. Zhang, and L. J. Wysocki Silent Development of Memory Progenitor B Cells J. Immunol., October 15, 2007; 179(8): 5181 - 5190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Johnston, A. L. Wood, D. J. Bolland, and A. E. Corcoran Complete Sequence Assembly and Characterization of the C57BL/6 Mouse Ig Heavy Chain V Region J. Immunol., April 1, 2006; 176(7): 4221 - 4234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. S. Raman, R. S. Akondy, S. Rath, V. Bal, and A. George Ligation of CD27 on B Cells In Vivo during Primary Immunization Enhances Commitment to Memory B Cell Responses J. Immunol., December 1, 2003; 171(11): 5876 - 5881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Shannon and R. Mehr Reconciling Repertoire Shift with Affinity Maturation: The Role of Deleterious Mutations J. Immunol., April 1, 1999; 162(7): 3950 - 3956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Monnet, D. Laune, J. Laroche-Traineau, M. Biard-Piechaczyk, L. Briant, C. Bes, M. Pugniere, J.-C. Mani, B. Pau, M. Cerutti, et al. Synthetic Peptides Derived from the Variable Regions of an Anti-CD4 Monoclonal Antibody Bind to CD4 and Inhibit HIV-1 Promoter Activation in Virus-infected Cells J. Biol. Chem., February 5, 1999; 274(6): 3789 - 3796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Giorgetti and J. L. Press Somatic Mutation in the Neonatal Mouse J. Immunol., December 1, 1998; 161(11): 6093 - 6104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]