|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Journal of Immunology, Vol 151, Issue 1 310-321, Copyright © 1993 by American Association of Immunologists
ARTICLES |
M Colden-Stanfield, D Ratcliffe, EB Cramer and EK Gallin
Department of Physiology, Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, Bethesda, MD 20889-5603.
The adherence of undifferentiated 51Cr-labeled HL-60 (0.5 x 10(6) HL-60 cells/well) cells was monitored on influenza virus-infected HUVEC monolayers. Whereas only 3.0 +/- 1.6% (n = 36) of HL-60 cells adhered to uninfected HUVEC, adherence was increased to 41.7 +/- 2.2% (n = 6), 79.7 +/- 1.2% (n = 6), 83.9 +/- 0.7% (n = 6), and 84.4 +/- 0.5% (n = 6) on HUVEC infected for 7 h at a MOI of 1, 3, 6, and 9, respectively. In comparison, HL-60 cell adherence increased to 35% when HUVEC monolayers were stimulated with LPS (0.2-20 micrograms) for 4 h. Increased adherence to infected HUVEC occurred at 5 h postinfection, peaked at 7 h, and was maintained at 24 h postinfection. Active virus and metabolically active endothelial cells were required to mediate the virus-induced adherence. E-selectin and ICAM-1 Ag were upregulated 78.3- and 4.1-fold, respectively, by LPS (0.02-20 micrograms, 4 h) whereas virus infection (7 h) only increased these proteins 2.6- and 1.4-fold with a MOI > or = 16. Although the time courses of expression for both adhesion molecules after LPS treatment of virus infection were similar, the difference in the magnitude of upregulation suggests that virus- induced adherence is not a result of upregulation of E-selectin and ICAM-1. In contrast, surface expression of HA is involved in HL-60 cell adherence to virus-infected HUVEC because (1) the time course and magnitude of HA AG expression paralleled the time course and magnitude of HL-60 cell adherence after virus infection of HUVEC; (2) HL-60 cell aggregates were absent on infected HUVEC monolayers in the presence of anti-HA; (3) HL-60 cells competed with RBC for infected endothelial cells stained for cellular HA Ag and (4) anti-HA abolished the virus- induced adherence. Furthermore, it appears that HL-60 cells are binding directly to HA because HL-60 cell adherence to a cell-free surface was increased if virus was prebound and neuraminidase treatment of HL-60 cells prevented the HL-60 cell adherence to influenza virus-infected endothelial monolayers.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Naghavi, Z. Barlas, S. Siadaty, S. Naguib, M. Madjid, and W. Casscells Association of Influenza Vaccination and Reduced Risk of Recurrent Myocardial Infarction Circulation, December 19, 2000; 102(25): 3039 - 3045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Gharavi, S. S. Pierangeli, M. Colden-Stanfield, X. W. Liu, R. G. Espinola, and E. N. Harris GDKV-Induced Antiphospholipid Antibodies Enhance Thrombosis and Activate Endothelial Cells In Vivo and In Vitro J. Immunol., September 1, 1999; 163(5): 2922 - 2927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Pierangeli, M. Colden-Stanfield, X. Liu, J. H. Barker, G. L. Anderson, and E. N. Harris Antiphospholipid Antibodies From Antiphospholipid Syndrome Patients Activate Endothelial Cells In Vitro and In Vivo Circulation, April 20, 1999; 99(15): 1997 - 2002. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Colden-Stanfield and E. K. Gallin Modulation of K+ currents in monocytes by VCAM-1 and E-selectin on activated human endothelium Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, July 1, 1998; 275(1): C267 - C277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhang, D. M. Center, D. M. H. Wu, W. W. Cruikshank, J. Yuan, D. W. Andrews, and H. Kornfeld Processing and Activation of Pro-Interleukin-16 by Caspase-3 J. Biol. Chem., January 9, 1998; 273(2): 1144 - 1149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. P. Gurfinkel, R. L. de la Fuente, O. Mendiz, B. Mautner, and for the FLUVACS Study Group Influenza Vaccine Pilot Study in Acute Coronary Syndromes and Planned Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: The FLU Vaccination Acute Coronary Syndromes (FLUVACS) Study Circulation, May 7, 2002; 105(18): 2143 - 2147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |