The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schad, V. C.
Right arrow Articles by Phipps, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schad, V. C.
Right arrow Articles by Phipps, R. P.

The Journal of Immunology, Vol 141, Issue 1 79-84, Copyright © 1988 by American Association of Immunologists


ARTICLES

Two signals are required for accessory cells to induce B cell unresponsiveness. Tolerogenic Ig and prostaglandin

VC Schad and RP Phipps
Immunology Unit, Cancer Center, Rochester, NY 14642.

We previously demonstrated that a lymphoid dendritic cell-like tumor line (P388AD.2) presented a normally tolerogenic signal, fluoresceinated sheep gamma-globulin (FL-SGG), as an immunogenic one. In contrast, macrophages derived from the peritoneal cavity potentiated the ability of FL-SGG to induce B cell unresponsiveness. In this paper we examined whether two different Ia+ splenic accessory cells differentially presented tolerogen to spleen cells or fluorescein (FL)- binding B cells. Interestingly, lymphoid dendritic cells presented FL- SGG to spleen cells and elicited augmented anti-FL antibody responses, whereas splenic macrophages presented this same moiety and elicited hapten-specific B cell unresponsiveness. The mechanism of splenic macrophage-elicited B cell negative signaling was investigated, and it was found that B cell unresponsiveness was abrogated in the presence of the cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin. This observation suggested a crucial role for PG in B cell negative signaling. The addition of 10 nM PGE2 restored unresponsiveness in cultures treated with indomethacin and tolerogen-pulsed macrophages, even though this dose of PG had no effect on the ability of B cells to be triggered by an immunogenic signal. A role for T cells was excluded, inasmuch as purified hapten- specific B cells were specifically tolerized by FL-SGG-pulsed macrophages. Lymphoid dendritic cells pulsed with FL-SGG did not deliver a tolerogenic or immunogenic signal to FL-specific B cells. However, when PGE2 was supplied, B cell unresponsiveness was induced. Finally, we tested whether "non-tolerogenic" doses of FL-SGG could render hapten-specific B cells unresponsive in the presence of PGE2, but in the absence of accessory cells. Interestingly, the combination of non-tolerogenic amounts (10 to 1000 pg/ml) of FL-SGG in conjunction with PGE2 induced unresponsiveness, whereas neither moiety alone was effective. These results suggest that splenic macrophages and lymphoid dendritic cells exert opposing effects on the immune system as evidenced by the induction of negative or positive B cell signaling. Our observations suggest that one of the key factors in controlling whether an accessory cell delivers a tolerogenic signal is the ability to secrete PG.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1988 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1988 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.