The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strayer, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Dombrowski, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strayer, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Dombrowski, J.

The Journal of Immunology, Vol 141, Issue 1 347-351, Copyright © 1988 by American Association of Immunologists


ARTICLES

Immunosuppression during viral oncogenesis. V. Resistance to virus- induced immunosuppressive factor

DS Strayer and J Dombrowski
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston 77030.

Rabbits given malignant rabbit fibroma virus (MV) develop severe immunologic dysfunction during the course of infection. Splenic T lymphocytes from these rabbits elaborate a soluble non-specific immunosuppressive factor (virus-induced suppressor factor (VISF]. As malignant rabbit fibroma virus infection progresses, normal immunologic responsiveness returns. This recovery is multi-factorial and involves production by T lymphocytes of a soluble factor capable of antagonizing the activity of VISF. This soluble anti-suppressor factor (ASF) is not a generalized immunologic potentiator. Its sole apparent effect on immune function appears to be to antagonize the activity of VISF. The protective effects of ASF are evident only when suppressor factors and ASF are simultaneously present in culture. Pre-treatment of target cells with ASF-containing culture supernatants does not render them insensitive to the immunosuppressive effects of subsequent treatment with VISF. In addition, ASF appears to be directly responsible for antagonizing VISF activity. That is, ASF does not appear to initiate an anti-suppressive cascade by activating a population of cells that in turn generate secondary protective factors. ASF-producing cells do not bind Vicia villosa lectin, as do contra-suppressor cells described by others. In almost all of these features, the system we describe herein differs from systems in which other investigators have described factors that antagonize the effects of suppressor factors.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1988 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1988 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.