The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sibley, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sibley, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. S.

The Journal of Immunology, Vol 140, Issue 10 3502-3507, Copyright © 1988 by American Association of Immunologists


ARTICLES

Shared idiotypes on anti-DNA and anti-poly (ADP-ribose) antibodies

JT Sibley, LJ Latimer and JS Lee
Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.

Hed 10 is a ssDNA-specific mAb derived from an NZB/W autoimmune mouse. ADP 1 is a poly(ADP-ribose)-specific mAb derived from a C57BL/6 mouse. Rabbit anti-idiotypic sera were raised against Hed 10 and ADP 1. By affinity chromatography it was shown that at least 20 to 30% of DNA- binding antibodies contained these idiotypes. The sera were also used to evaluate idiotypic cross-reactivity among 26 diverse, predominantly anti-nucleic acid, murine mAb. Each serum bound directly to several mAb and in addition inhibited the binding of several antibodies to their appropriate Ag. The anti-Hed 10 serum detected an idiotype which was restricted to antibodies that bound to poly(dT) and/or poly(ADP- ribose). The anti-ADP 1 serum detected a more widely distributed idiotype contained in antibodies which bound to a variety of nucleic acids. Although both sera bound directly to Hed 10, only the anti-Hed 10 serum could compete for the binding of Hed 10 to poly(dT). On the other hand, both sera could compete for the binding of ADP 1 to poly(ADP-ribose) as well as bind directly to ADP 1. In addition anti- ADP 1 serum appeared to enhance, rather than inhibit, the binding of one mAb to native calf thymus DNA and poly[d(AT)] but had no effect on the binding to several ssDNA. These results demonstrate that many antibodies which recognize DNA and poly(ADP-ribose) have shared idiotypes. This may be of relevance to the development of autoimmunity because poly(ADP-ribose) is ubiquitous and immunogenic.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
P. O. Hassa, S. S. Haenni, M. Elser, and M. O. Hottiger
Nuclear ADP-Ribosylation Reactions in Mammalian Cells: Where Are We Today and Where Are We Going?
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., September 1, 2006; 70(3): 789 - 829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1988 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1988 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.