The JI PBL Intereron Source
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hemler, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hemler, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, J. G.

The Journal of Immunology, Vol 138, Issue 9 2941-2948, Copyright © 1987 by American Association of Immunologists


ARTICLES

Cell matrix adhesion-related proteins VLA-1 and VLA-2: regulation of expression on T cells

ME Hemler and JG Jacobson

The mitogens phytohemagglutinin (PHA) and concanavalin A inhibited the appearance of the very late activation antigen (VLA)-1, but did not inhibit VLA-2 expression on cultured activated T cells. In contrast to diminished VLA-1 expression, mitogen treatment caused increased cell surface expression of other activation antigens such as T10, HLA-DR, interleukin 2 (IL 2) receptor, and 4F2, and greater cell proliferation. Conversely, when T cells were not repetitively restimulated with mitogen, these less proliferative "postactivated" T cells had elevated VLA-1 expression. The diminished expression of VLA-1 caused by PHA was reversible since subsequent removal of mitogen was associated with increased VLA-1, paralleled by a decrease in interleukin 2 receptor levels. In addition to preventing or delaying the initial appearance of VLA-1, PHA stimulation also was somewhat effective in causing the disappearance of VLA-1 already present, especially on recently established cultures. However, cultures that had either never seen PHA, not seen PHA for several weeks, or been stimulated regularly with PHA, but were several months old, did not lose VLA-1 in response to PHA stimulation, suggesting that a state of insensitivity to PHA effects could be attained. Unlike PHA-stimulated T cells, T cells repetitively restimulated with alloantigen or the monoclonal antibody T3 did not show a marked absence of VLA-1 but rather showed an increased level of VLA-2 relative to VLA-1. Taken together, results of stimulation by either mitogen, alloantigen, or anti-T3 monoclonal antibody support the conclusion that T cell stimulation in general can cause a decreased VLA- 1:VLA-2 ratio, whether by decreased VLA-1 or increased VLA-2. These shifts in VLA-1:VLA-2 ratios are probably not simply the result of shifts in the relative proportions of different subpopulations, because similar growth-related changes in this ratio were observed on the T cell line ANITA, which is a homogeneous population of cells. Because both VLA-1 and VLA-2 are differentially regulated on cultured, long term activated T cells depending on stage of activation and growth conditions, and are members of a family of at least five heterodimers that includes cell matrix adhesion molecules, we suggest that these studies will provide clues to novel aspects of T cell growth regulation, perhaps relating to T cell-matrix adhesion.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1987 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1987 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.