The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geppert, T. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lipsky, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Geppert, T. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lipsky, P. E.

The Journal of Immunology, Vol 137, Issue 10 3065-3073, Copyright © 1986 by American Association of Immunologists


ARTICLES

Accessory cell-T cell interactions involved in anti-CD3-induced T4 and T8 cell proliferation: analysis with monoclonal antibodies

TD Geppert and PE Lipsky

The effect of monoclonal antibodies (Mab) directed at T cell and accessory cell (AC) surface molecules on OKT3-induced T4 and T8 cell proliferation was examined. Mab directed at nonpolymorphic class I (W6/32, MB40.5) and class II (L243) major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-encoded gene products, an epitope common to LFA-1, CR3, and the p150, 95 molecule (60.3), and a heterodimer present on monocytes (M phi) and activated T cells (4F2) inhibited M phi-supported OKT3-induced proliferation of both T4 and T8 cells. Moreover, an Mab directed at the CD4 molecule (66.1) inhibited OKT3-induced T4 but not T8 cell proliferation, whereas an Mab directed at the CD8 molecule (OKT8) inhibited T8 but not T4 cell responses. With the exception of 66.1, each inhibited OKT3-induced T cell proliferation when added as late as 15 hr after the initiation of culture. Inhibition could not be explained by competition for Fc receptors on the AC. A variety of other Mab including OKT11 and those directed at other HLA-DR and DQ determinants were not inhibitory. The inhibitory Mab were found to diminish T4 cell IL 2 production and IL 2 receptor expression. Consequently, IL 2 reversed some but not all of the Mab-mediated inhibition of T cell proliferation. In contrast to the effects noted with M phi-supported responses, 60.3 and 66.1 but neither L243 nor 4F2 inhibited OKT3-induced T4 cell proliferation supported by Ia- or IFN- gamma-treated Ia+ endothelial cells. None of the Mab tested inhibited T cell proliferation induced by the AC-independent stimuli OKT3 and phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) or calcium ionophore and PMA in the presence or absence of added AC. The data therefore suggest that the Mab inhibit OKT3-induced activation of T4 and T8 cells by preventing necessary interactions between AC and T cell surface proteins. Moreover, the results suggest that different arrays of interaction molecules are involved in OKT3-induced T cell proliferation depending on the nature of the AC and the responding T cell subset.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1986 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1986 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.