The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Epps, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Potter, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Epps, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Potter, J. W.

The Journal of Immunology, Vol 131, Issue 2 697-700, Copyright © 1983 by American Association of Immunologists


ARTICLES

Migration of human helper/inducer T cells in response to supernatants from Con A-stimulated suppressor/cytotoxic T cells

DE Van Epps, DA Durant and JW Potter

Previous studies have shown that supernatants from Con A-stimulated human mononuclear cells are chemotactic for T cells, and that the source of the activity is the Leu-2 (suppressor/cytotoxic) T cell. The specificity of this chemoattractant activity for Leu-2 and/or Leu-3 (helper/inducer) T cells was analyzed with isolated human T cell subsets in an in vitro chemotaxis assay system. These studies demonstrate that both human Leu-2 and Leu-3 cells migrate in response to the lymphocyte locomotor stimulus casein, whereas only Leu-3 cells migrate in response to supernatants from Con A-stimulated mononuclear cells. This migration of Leu-3 cells to the Con A supernatant was reflected in both the distance migrated and the number of migrating cells. When Leu-2 cell locomotion in response to Con A supernatants was analyzed, no significant differences from control were observed in either the distance migrated or the number of migrating cells. Supernatants from Con A-stimulated Leu-2 cells similarly attracted Leu- 3 cells but not Leu-2 cells in a concentration-dependent manner. Supernatants from Con A-stimulated Leu-3 cells did not stimulate either Leu-2 or Leu-3 cell migration. These studies demonstrate that Leu-3 T cells migrate in response to supernatants from Con A-stimulated Leu-2 T cells. This specific response may promote cell-to-cell interaction by providing a means for Leu-2 T cells to recruit Leu-3 T cells.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CVIHome page
B. Desnues, M. Ihrig, D. Raoult, and J.-L. Mege
Whipple's Disease: a Macrophage Disease
Clin. Vaccine Immunol., February 1, 2006; 13(2): 170 - 178.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
D Seegert, P Rosenstiel, H Pfahler, P Pfefferkorn, S Nikolaus, and S Schreiber
Increased expression of IL-16 in inflammatory bowel disease
Gut, March 1, 2001; 48(3): 326 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1983 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1983 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.