The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


The Journal of Immunology, 1979, 123: 2682-2688.
Copyright © 1979 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sherr, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Dorf, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sherr, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Dorf, M. E.

Immune Suppression in Vivo with Antigen-Modified Syngeneic Cells

III. Distinctions Between T Cell Tolerance and T Cell Mediated Suppression1

David H. Sherr, Krikor M. Heghinian, Baruj Benacerraf and Martin E. Dorf

From the Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115

Abstract

Intravenous administration of syngeneic spleen cells coupled with the palmitoyl derivative of fowl {gamma}-globulin (p-F{gamma}G) results in a profound state of F{gamma}G carrier-specific tolerance in C57BL/6 mice. This nonresponsiveness can be attributed to two independent mechanisms, i.e., T cell tolerance and T cell suppression. The two phenomena could be distinguished on the basis of kinetics of induction, inducer cell dose requirements, and cyclophosphamide sensitivity. Thus, a 3-day period is required for the induction of T cell tolerance, and 7 days are required to induce immune suppression. Furthermore, at least 106 p-F{gamma}G-coupled cells must be administered to induce tolerance, whereas suppression could be induced with as few as 103 cells. In addition, the T cell tolerance was not sensitive to cyclophosphamide pretreatment, whereas the T cell suppression was cyclophosphamide sensitive. In contrast to T cell tolerance, suppressor T cells exerted their effects nonspecifically in the effector phase once they were stimulated with the inducing antigen.

In addition, a state of split responsiveness was demonstrated in animals given a subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of antigen-coupled cells. The s.c. route of induction resulted in a strong state of PFC nonresponsiveness while simultaneously priming for delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses as assayed by footpad swelling. Thus, p-F{gamma}G-coupled syngeneic spleen cells are capable of inducing: 1) T cell tolerance, 2) immune suppression, and 3) priming of DTH-reactive cells, depending on the conditions employed.

Footnotes

1 This work was supported by Grants AI-14732 and AI-00152 from the National Institutes of Health, and Grant PCM 75-22422 from the National Science Foundation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1979 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1979 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.