The JI PBL Intereron Source
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


The Journal of Immunology, 1979, 122: 2198-2203.
Copyright © 1979 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheehy, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Charmot, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sheehy, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Charmot, D.

Specific Inhibition of Human Lymphocyte Responses by Primed Autologous Lymphocytes

I. Evaluation of MLR Inhibition As a Model for Suppression1

Michael J. Sheehy2, Claude Mawas3 and Dominique Charmot3

From the Centre d'Immunologie INSERM-CNRS de Marseille-Luminy, Case 906, 13288 Marseille Cédex 2, France

Abstract

Human lymphocytes from person A, primed for 10 to 14 days in MLC against lymphocytes from person B, inhibit specifically the proliferative response to B by fresh (i.e., unprimed) lymphocytes of A. Gamma-irradiated (2000 R) primed lymphocytes likewise inhibit specifically, although less strongly. Cells of A, primed with cells of B and then irradiated, usually can inhibit the response of A to cells of any individual sharing HLA-D antigens with B, and the effect tends to be independent of the number of stimulating cells. We also often see inhibition of responses to cells sharing HLA-A and -B antigens with person B, but this effect tends to be lost when the number of stimulating cells is increased. Similarly, at low doses, cells primed for HLA-D antigen a appear not to inhibit the response to an irrelevant HLA-D antigen b on the same stimulating cell. At higher doses of primed cells, even the response to the irrelevant antigen is inhibited. These data suggest to us that at least two mechanisms may be involved: one directed at the stimulating cell (most likely cell-mediated cytolysis), and predominant at high ratios of primed cells to stimulating cells; the other directed at specific clones of responding cells, and predominant at low ratios.

Footnotes

1 This work was supported in part by INSERM, CNRS, and DGRST.

2 Visiting Scientist under a two-year fellowship from CNRS and INSERM.

3 Research Scientist of INSERM.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1979 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1979 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.