The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


The Journal of Immunology, 1978, 121: 2148-2152.
Copyright © 1978 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ziccardi, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, N. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ziccardi, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, N. R.

Modulation of the Antigenicity of C1r and C1s by C1 Inactivator1

Robert J. Ziccardi and Neil R. Cooper

From the Department of Molecular Immunology, Research Institute of Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California 92037

Abstract

The first complement component, C1, was activated in normal human sera by addition of aggregated IgG, immune complexes, and lipopolysaccharide, after which the concentrations of the C1 subcomponents, C1r and C1s, were measured by single radial immunodiffusion. A progressive reduction in C1r antigen content was observed as greater amounts of activator were added to normal human sera. Three lines of evidence proved that the apparent disappearance of C1r was due to interaction of C1r with C1 Inactivator (C1 In). First, no loss of C1r antigen was detected in sera from patients with hereditary angioneurotic edema, which lack functional C1 Inactivator. Second, reconstitution of these patients' sera with physiologic concentrations of purified C1 In resulted in the disappearance of C1r antigen. Third, purified C1 In greatly reduced the intensity of the precipitin line formed between purified C1r and anti-C1r.

In parallel experiments, certain antisera to C1s were found to show a comparable disappearance of C1s antigenic content in activated human sera. This antigenic loss was similarly shown to be due to the interaction of C1s with C1 In. However, it should be noted that the detection of changes of C1s antigenicity was dependent on the specificity of the C1s antisera employed, since antisera with antigenic specificities apparently directed to determinants on the C1s molecule distant from the region of interaction with C1 In did not show changes with activation.

Ultracentrifugal studies demonstrated that C1r and C1s formed soluble complexes with C1 In in activated serum, thus precluding the possibility that C1r and C1s escape immunochemical detection in activated serum by being present in large aggregated complexes. Also ruled out, in the case of C1s, is the possibility that the binding of C1 In leads to a major conformational rearrangement of C1s with resulting changes in exposed antigens of the molecule. It is most likely that the loss in C1r and C1s antigenic content with activation of C1 in serum occurs because of simple physical masking of the relevant antigens of C1r and C1s by the relatively large C1 In molecule.

Footnotes

1 This is publication Number 1559 from the Research Institute of Scripps Clinic. This work was supported by Public Health Service Grants CA 14692, AI 07007, AI 14502, and I S07 RR-05514 from the National Institutes of Health and Grant-in-Aid 77-941 from the American Heart Association.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1978 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1978 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.