The JI PBL Intereron Source
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 

The Journal of Immunology, 1976, 117: 66-72.
Copyright © 1976 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geczy, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by de Weck, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Geczy, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by de Weck, A. L.

Antibodies to Guinea Pig Lymphokines

II. Suppression of Delayed Hypersensitivity Reactions by a "Second Generation" Goat Antibody Against Guinea Pig Lymphokines1

Carolyn L. Geczy, Andrew F. Geczy and Alain L. de Weck

From the Institute for Clinical Immunology, Inselspital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland

Abstract

A "second generation" antibody to a highly purified lymphocyte product was raised in a goat against material eluted from a rabbit anti-guinea pig lymphokine immunoadsorbent column. This anti-lymphokine serum, in contrast to anti-lymphocyte serum (ALS) did not appear to contain cytotoxic antibodies directed against membrane antigens on guinea pig lymph node lymphocytes. Furthermore, the anti-lymphokine serum did not inhibit the formation of spontaneous T rosettes nor significantly depress lymphocyte response to mitogens.

The anti-lymphokine serum totally suppressed the delayed skin reactivity to PPD and contact sensitivity to DNCB when injected intradermally around the site of antigen challenge. By contrast, intradermally injected ALS did not appear to suppress the PPD response in sensitized guinea pigs. Intravenously and i.p. administered anti-lymphokine serum was somewhat less effective in suppressing the delayed skin response to PPD. The intradermal injection of the antiserum had no effect on nonspecific inflammation evoked by turpentine-olive oil or on the extravasation of circulating Evans blue evoked by intradermally injected histamine.

Histologic examination of 24-hr DNCB-induced skin lesions from sensitized guinea pigs treated with intradermally injected anti-lymphokine serum showed marked reduction of mononuclear infiltration of the dermis and of epidermal lesions, as compared with skin sites taken from sensitized animals pretreated with normal goat serum. The anti-lymphokine serum injected i.v. also markedly reduced the perivascular infiltration of the dermis and subcutis in skin reaction sites from sensitized animals challenged with PPD. Intravenous treatment with ALS for 3 consecutive days caused extensive depletion of the paracortical areas of peripheral lymph nodes whereas treatment with normal serum and anti-lymphokine serum caused no such depletion.

It is proposed that the anti-lymphokine serum is directed against activated lymphocyte products, one of them being MIF. These products are involved in the mediation of delayed hypersensitivity reactions. This is in marked contrast to ALS, the suppressive action of which appears to be central rather than peripheral.

Footnotes

1 This work was supported by grants from the Swiss National Foundation for Scientific Research (3.468.75; 3.469.75).






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1976 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1976 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.