HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McFarland, H. F. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by McFarland, H. F.

The Effect of Measles Virus Infection on T and B Lymphocytes in the Mouse

I. Suppression of Helper Cell Activity¹

From the Medical Research Council Neuroimmunology Project, University College-London, London, and Department of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, 21205

Abstract

The effect of measles virus infection on T and B lymphocytes in the mouse has been studied with a system of cell cooperation for production of an anti-hapten response. The effect of virus was studied by infecting helper cell or antibody-forming precursor cell donors with measles virus at various times before cell transfer into recipient mice and measuring the anti-hapten response after challenge with carrier-hapten conjugates. These studies indicate that measles virus produces a significant reduction in the anti-hapten response. This reduction in antibody formation is caused predominately by measles virus suppression of T helper cell function and possibly by a lesser effect on B cell function. The suppression of T cells is transient and corresponds to the time during which measles antigen can be demonstrated in the mouse spleens. Although infectious virus cannot be recovered from the lymphocytes, the suppression of T cells could only be demonstrated after inoculation with a virus strain capable of replicating in the mouse. These findings suggest that the virus may be present in a non-infectious or defective form. The effect of measles virus in T cells does not appear to be due to a depletion of T cells. The possible mechanisms for the suppressive effect are discussed.

Footnotes

¹ This work was supported in part by Grant 628-B-5 from The National Multiple Sclerosis Society.

² Recipient of Special Fellowship (NS 02286) from the United States Public Health Service.