HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Greisman, S. E. Articles by DuBuy, B. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Greisman, S. E. Articles by DuBuy, B.

Mechanisms of Endotoxin Tolerance

VIII. Specificity of Serum Transfer¹

From the Departments of Medicine and Physiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201

Abstract

Acclimatized rabbits were passively immunized with graded volumes of antisera against endotoxins from either smooth wild type Gram-negative bacteria possessing intact O-antigenic side chains, or rough mutants deficient in these O-antigens. The recipients were challenged with test doses of endotoxins that evoked fever within the sensitive dose-response range. Pyrogenic tolerance conferred with antisera to smooth endotoxins was consistently directed toward the O-specific antigen; minimal protection extended to endotoxins from heterologous Gram-negative bacterial species, or from homologous O-deficient rough mutant strains. In contrast, antisera to O-deficient rough mutant strains transferred significantly more effective protection against heterologous endotoxins. The level of such heterologous protection, however, was markedly less than the O-specific protection conveyed by the smooth anti-endotoxin sera.

The protective factors in antiserum to smooth endotoxin were separable by either pyrogen-free Sephadex G-200 columns or ammonium sulfate precipitation into 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME) resistant and sensitive O-antibody-containing fractions. In the latter, 2-ME virtually abolished O-agglutinating, but not O-combining or protective activities. Both O-combining and protective activities could be reduced by absorption of antiserum with spleen cells but not with erythrocytes.

It is concluded that: 1) the humoral components of endotoxin tolerance are antibodies to both O-specific and common core antigens. Such antibodies are both IgM and IgG, protect by primary (binding) rather than secondary (agglutinating) activity, and are in part cytophilic; 2) the relative importance of O-specific and common core antibodies is dependent upon both the immunizing and test endotoxin preparations. Antisera to smooth endotoxins afford the highest levels of passive tolerance, but such protection is restricted primarily to the O-specific endotoxin. Antisera to rough O-deficient endotoxins provide less tolerance but afford the better approach to broad passive endotoxin protection; 3) the findings support the hypothesis that common core antigens are partially masked by the O-specific antigens in the endotoxin molecule.

Footnotes

¹ This work was supported by the United States Public Health Service, Research Grant AI 07052.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S.E. Greisman and C.A. Johnston Review: Evidence against the hypothesis that antibodies to the inner core of lipopolysaccharides in antisera raised by immunization with enterobacterial deep-rough mutants confer broad-spectrum protection during Gram-negative bacterial sepsis Innate Immunity, April 1, 1997; 4(2): 123 - 153. [Abstract] [PDF]