The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


The Journal of Immunology, 1973, 110: 1253-1261.
Copyright © 1973 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Polmar, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Terry, W. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Polmar, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Terry, W. D.

A Comparison of Three Radioimmunoassay Techniques for the Measurement of Serum IgE

Stephen H. Polmar1, Thomas A. Waldmann and William D. Terry

From the Immunology and Metabolism Branches of the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20014

Abstract

Three radioimmunoassay techniques [double antibody, Sepharose-bound antibody and bromacetylcellulose (BAC)-bound antibody] were compared. These three methods were used to measure the immunoglobulin E levels in sera of patients with schistosomiasis with very high IgE levels, in sera from normal adults, and in sera that were presumed to have very low IgE levels, including sera from immunodeficient patients and from a variety of non-primate species. There was, in general, good agreement among the three methods when the IgE concentration was elevated, as in patients with schistosomiasis and in some normal adults. In contrast, very significant differences in the estimates of the IgE concentration of the same serum were observed with the different techniques when the serum IgE levels were low. IgE was very low or undetectable in sera of many patients with immunodeficiency when studied by the double antibody technique, but these IgE deficiencies were often missed when the Sepharose or BAC techniques were used. For example, the IgE levels were found to be less than 15% of normal for 80% of the patients with ataxia telangiectasia studied by the double antibody technique, but IgE levels appeared to be normal when assayed by the Sepharose and BAC techniques. The IgE levels determined by the Sepharose method in patients with immunodeficiency were intermediate between the lower double antibody and the higher BAC values. Similarly, sera of various non-primate species were found to inhibit significantly the binding of radiolabeled IgE to the insoluble anti-IgE antibody and gave significant appearent IgE concentrations when the BAC or Sepharose techniques were used, but not when the double antibody technique was used. Thus, the BAC and, to a lesser extent, the Sepharose technique appeared to give falsely high IgE estimates when the levels of human IgE in the serum were low. The double antibody radioimmunoassay appears to be the method of choice for the measurement of serum IgE because it has greater sensitivity and reproducibility, and especially because it gives meaningful estimates for IgE in the critically important low IgE range observed with immunologic deficiency.

Footnotes

1 Present address and reprint address: Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Rainbow Babies' and Childrens' Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio 44106.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1973 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1973 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.