The JI PBL Intereron Source
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


The Journal of Immunology, 1973, 110: 107-117.
Copyright © 1973 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katz, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Benacerraf, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Katz, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Benacerraf, B.

Carrier Function in Anti-Hapten Antibody Responses

VI. Establishment of Experimental Conditions for Either Inhibitory or Enhancing Influences of Carrier-Specific Cells on Antibody Production

David H. Katz, William E. Paul and Baruj Benacerraf

From the Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, and the Laboratory of Immunology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20014

Abstract

Guinea pigs primed with 2,4-dinitrophenyl (DNP)-ovalbumin (OVA) will develop markedly enhanced secondary anti-DNP antibody responses to the heterologous conjugate DNP-bovine {gamma} globulin (BGG) provided that they have been supplementally immunized with appropriate amounts of BGG. This phenomenon reflects the enhancing influence of BGG-specific thymus-derived (T) lymphocytes on anti-DNP antibody production. The present studies demonstrate that such enhancing T cell influences can be abolished by the following manipulations: 1) simultaneous supplemental immunization with two unrelated proteins such as BGG and keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) or glucose oxidase (GO) significantly diminished the secondary anti-DNP response upon challenge with a DNP-conjugate of one of the carriers employed; 2) the intraperitoneal injection of soluble BGG, in the appropriate dose range, 1 day before secondary DNP-BGG challenge completely abolishes the anti-DNP response regardless of whether BGG alone or BGG together with KLH had been used in the supplemental immunization; 3) a challenge with soluble KLH 1 day before secondary challenge with DNP-BGG inhibits the anti-DNP response provided KLH had been administered simultaneously with BGG in the supplemental immunization. The failure to observe similar suppression when KLH was replaced by a copolymer of d-glutamic acid and d-lysine (D-GL) which is nonimmunogenic for T cells indicates that this suppression is a reflection of a T cell-mediated influence.

We have interpreted these observations to indicate the production of soluble inhibitory mediators in phenomena such as antigen-induced suppression ("antigenic competition") and, furthermore, that the elaboration of such mediators is most likely by T lymphocytes. Reasons for favoring the concept that enhancing or inhibitory influences on antibody production represent two ends of the spectrum of regulation exerted, perhaps, by the same T cell product are discussed.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1973 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1973 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.